Md. Rakib Hasan
Bridge1400

01 / 05

Bridge1400

Connecting waterfront culture to urban density

Type
Mixed-use hotel
Location
Seattle, WA
Year
2025
Context
Graduate studio, WSU
Role
Sole designer
Tools
Revit, D5 Render, AutoCAD, Photoshop, Illustrator, Google Earth Studio

Bridge1400 sits on the threshold between Seattle's mercantile downtown and its waterfront. Instead of smoothing over that break, the project makes it spatial: a tall void cuts through the podium as a civic canyon linking Alaskan Way to Western Avenue.

A grand stair works as both passage and pause, and a slow ramp climbs past planted terraces with filtered views of Elliott Bay. Above the four-level retail and lobby podium, a mass timber hotel tower frames the water to the northwest and the city to the southeast.

Levels13
StructureGlulam and CLT tower on a concrete podium
ProgramRetail, hotel lobby, restaurants, pool, 9 guest-room levels

Site

Between Pike Place Market and the waterfront promenade, the site takes its cues from both: vertical density to the east, openness and movement to the west.

Site context: downtown Seattle and Elliott BayPike Place MarketPublic market since 1907Overlook WalkMarket-to-waterfront link, opened 2024SiteWestern Ave and Union StAlaskan WayWaterfront boulevard
  1. Pike Place Market Public market since 1907
  2. Overlook Walk Market-to-waterfront link, opened 2024
  3. Site Western Ave and Union St
  4. Alaskan Way Waterfront boulevard
Site context: downtown Seattle and Elliott Bay

Sketches

Hand sketches in section, plan and elevation explored how the floor plates stack, shift and turn toward the water.

Plan study 1
Plan study 1
Plan study 2
Plan study 2
Plan study 3
Plan study 3
Section study
Section study
Section study
Section study
Elevation study
Elevation study

Waterfront to city

The site sits between two cultures: the open, moving waterfront to the west and the dense commercial city to the east. The building steps up between them.

Waterfront culture

Ferries, piers, seafood markets and public promenades give the waterfront a culture of openness and flow. The building's glass and timber echo its marine and industrial traditions.

Western edge | Tourism

Hotel spaces

The tower is a retreat above the city with panoramic views of Elliott Bay. Its mass timber structure brings warmth and quiet to the rooms.

Concept section: from the waterfront up to downtown

Spatial and experiential continuity

Urban density

Downtown's verticality and program intensity shape the eastern edge: functions stack vertically, while back-of-house services and circulation stay discreet.

Eastern zone | Commercial

Retail spaces

At street level, transparent frontage, varied tenant spaces and several entries make the podium the building's public interface.

Concept section: from the waterfront up to downtown

Form

Eight moves take the block from a full zoning envelope to the final form.

  1. Step 1

    Initial massing

    A full-site envelope at a uniform 13 stories uses the whole allowable zoning volume.

  2. Step 2

    Daylight optimization

    A major cut along Alaskan Way reduces bulk and leaves a long tower parallel to Western Avenue, opening daylight to neighbors.

  3. Step 3

    Voiding for interlocking

    A deeper cut at the lower southeast corner, facing Union Street, makes room for a second tower mass.

  4. Step 4

    Secondary tower

    A smaller, sloped volume interlocks with the main tower, adding tension and a dual massing language.

  5. Step 5

    Podium

    A 4-level base holds retail and the hotel lobby. A tall void at the corner draws pedestrians in.

  6. Step 6

    Access carve-outs

    Cuts at the southeast corner for egress stairs and at the southwest edge for direct retail and restaurant access.

  7. Step 7

    Central atrium

    A mid-block cut brings light into the podium core, and a cut on the east face opens a retail entry toward Alaskan Way.

  8. Step 8

    Experiential ramp

    A gently sloped internal ramp links Level 4 and Level 5 as a promenade with waterfront views.

Mass timber

The four-level podium is concrete. Above it, the hotel tower is built in mass timber: glulam columns and beams carry CLT floors, arranged around concrete cores. Exposed wood gives the guest rooms warmth and quiet, carries the project's biophilic approach, and echoes the timber and glass of the working waterfront. Timber also stores carbon instead of emitting it, which the design study estimates below.

Carbon stored in the CLT

33,000t CO2

metric tons, design-study estimate

0.9 t

CO2 stored per m³ of CLT

7.5 ft³

structural timber per ft² of floor

Try it: timber floor area

173,000ft² of floor
Timber
1.30M
ft³ of CLT and glulam
CO2 stored
33,081
metric tons
Cars
7,191
off the road for a year

Rates from WoodWorks and the U.S. Forest Service; 4.6 t CO2 per car per year (EPA).

Plans

Retail activates the first two levels. The hotel lobby, restaurants and an infinity pool fill the podium, and guest rooms stack above with terraces and a sky lounge.

Level
Level 1 floor plan
NorthLevel 1
  • Retail shops
  • Service area
Level 2 floor plan
NorthLevel 2
  • Retail shops
  • Service area
Level 3 floor plan
NorthLevel 3
  • Hotel lobby
  • Service area
  • Restaurant
  • Cafe
Level 4 floor plan
NorthLevel 4
  • Fitness zone
  • Service area
  • Restaurant
  • Cafe
  • Infinity pool area
Level 5 floor plan
NorthLevel 5
  • Guest rooms
  • Hotel service
  • Lounge
Levels 6 to 9 floor plan
NorthLevels 6 to 9
  • Guest rooms
  • Hotel service
  • Green terrace
Level 10 floor plan
NorthLevel 10
  • Guest rooms
  • Hotel service
  • Green terrace BBQ
Levels 12 and 13 floor plan
NorthLevels 12 and 13
  • Guest rooms
  • Hotel service
  • Lounge

Sections

Double-height retail glazing, a restaurant stair through a central void, and the pool-to-bar ramp are read together in section.

Section AAHotel roomsFramed toward views, daylight and quietFitness centerDaylight and open viewsOutdoor restaurantDraws people in from Union St and Western AveRetail glazingDouble-height, dual-glazed storefrontElevator pit8 ft deep for mechanical clearanceDrinks barSocial anchor with water and city viewsPool-to-bar rampLinks the Level 4 pool and Level 5 barRestaurant stairRises through a central voidCafe kitchenBack-of-house beside the cafeRetail street edgeDouble-height storefronts draw people in
  1. Hotel rooms Framed toward views, daylight and quiet
  2. Fitness center Daylight and open views
  3. Outdoor restaurant Draws people in from Union St and Western Ave
  4. Retail glazing Double-height, dual-glazed storefront
  5. Elevator pit 8 ft deep for mechanical clearance
  6. Drinks bar Social anchor with water and city views
  7. Pool-to-bar ramp Links the Level 4 pool and Level 5 bar
  8. Restaurant stair Rises through a central void
  9. Cafe kitchen Back-of-house beside the cafe
  10. Retail street edge Double-height storefronts draw people in
Section AA

Performance

The design study sizes renewable energy and water systems for the building. Rooftop and facade PV cover part of the annual electricity use, and low-flow fixtures, greywater reuse and rainwater harvesting cut potable water demand.

Estimates from the design study: PV yield about 1,410 kWh per installed kW; rainfall 38 in per year. Water strategies overlap, so their savings are not added together. CLT stores about 0.9 t CO2 per m3 (WoodWorks, U.S. Forest Service); car equivalent uses EPA's 4.6 t CO2 per car per year.

How these were calculated
  • Solar output: 150 kW × 1,410 kWh per kW per year = 211,500 kWh ≈ 212 MWh. 212 ÷ 1,400 MWh = 15% of annual use.
  • Electricity bill: 1,400,000 kWh × $0.11 per kWh (middle of the 10 to 12¢ grid price) ≈ $154K per year. The study's $105K implies 7.5¢, below its own grid price, so the grid price is used here.
  • PV savings: 211,500 kWh × $0.11 ≈ $23K per year.
  • PV cost: 150,000 W × $1.00 per W = $150,000 before incentives. Simple payback: $150,000 ÷ $23,265 ≈ 6.4 years.
  • Water share: 740K ÷ 2.3M gal ≈ 32%, rounded to 33% in the study.
  • Low-flow fixtures: 30 to 50% of 2.3M gal = 690K to 1.15M gal. Greywater: 40 to 50% of 2.3M gal = 920K to 1.15M gal.
  • Water cost: the study's $8K saved on 740K gal implies about $10.80 per 1,000 gal, so the full 2.3M gal bill is about $25K per year.
  • Rainwater: 38 in of rain per year × 0.623 gal per ft² per inch × about 10,000 ft² of roof ≈ 236,740 gal.
  • CLT storage: 0.9 t CO2 per m³ ÷ 35.3 ft³ per m³ ≈ 25 kg per ft³. 33,000 t ÷ 0.0255 t per ft³ ≈ 1.3M ft³ of timber, about 173,000 ft² of floor at 7.5 ft³ per ft².
  • Timber vs concrete: 33,000 t stored ÷ 4,500 t emitted ≈ 7.3 times (745% in the study).
  • Cars: 33,000 t ÷ 4.6 t CO2 per car per year ≈ 7,200 cars.
  • Carbon value: $6.2M ÷ 33,000 t ≈ $188 per tonne, in line with EPA's social cost of carbon (about $190 per tonne).
212MWh of solar per year15% of the 1,400 MWh the building uses

Try it: grid electricity price

11.0¢per kWh
PV saves
$23K
per year
Payback
6.4 yr
on $150K of PV
Electricity bill
$154K
per year, before PV

150 kW rooftop and facade PV · 1,410 kWh per kW per year

2.3M gal

Potable water used per year

740K galof 2.3M gal per year
32%

managed sustainably

~$8K

water cost saved per year

Strategies overlap, so they are not added together. Hatched: the study’s range.

33,000 t CO2

stored in the CLT structure

4,500 t CO2

emitted by a concrete (RCC) structure
7.3×

more carbon stored in timber than concrete would emit

~7,200 cars off the road for a year

Each dot is 100 cars (4.6 t CO2 per car per year, EPA). Social cost of the stored carbon: ~$6.2M.